The National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) has given some clarifications about the concerns of a legal practitioner on the propriety of NITDA licensing law firms as Data Protection Compliance Organisations (DPCO) to provide data-privacy related services to the public.

The IT regulatory body noted that though the concern is genuine, the licencing of law firms as DPCO will no way stifle the growth of data privacy in Nigeria as posited by the legal practitioner. Rather, it exemplifies creativity and innovation in information technology regulation.

In a statement signed by Mrs. Hadiza Umar, Head, Corporate Affairs and External Relations, NITDA said the right to privacy is a constitutional right guaranteed by section 37 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended). However, it is factual and legal inaccuracy to equate the right of data privacy or indeed the provision of data privacy-related services, to the right to data protection. Data protection goes beyond protecting personal data privacy; it also involves the processes, systems and rules to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of data.

NITDA also argued that the Nigeria Data Protection Regulation (NDPR) does not seek to inhibit, restrict or curtail the rights of the legal practitioner as provided by the Legal Practitioners Act. Rather, it has opened a new vista of opportunities for lawyers to expand their practice into the area of Data Protection. Lawyers have a right to conduct, take part in proceedings and file court and administrative processes relating to the enforcement or defense of the right to privacy. However, not every lawyer has the competence to conduct and file the Annual Data Audit Report as prescribed by Article 4.1(5,6,7) of the NDPR.

NITDA licensed law firms understand that they represent the Agency in the drive to entrench compliance and help data holding entities to bridge the historical and systemic gap in data protection compliance in Nigeria. Unlike the requirements, legal practitioners must fulfill before appearing in the courts of law, the criteria for licensing as a DPCO, requires knowledge of data protection compliance and enforcement, which is not part of the residual knowledge of every lawyer.

The opinion of the author that the DPCO scheme lacks precedent is a testimony to the innovation NITDA is bringing to its regulatory mandate. Moreover, as the evergreen Lord Denning said in the case of Parker v. Parker, “If we never do anything which has not been done before, we shall never get anywhere.” While lawyers retain their privilege to traditional privacy rights advocacy and enforcement in most other jurisdictions, NDPR further recognises and institutionalises the capacity of prepared legal practitioners to participate in the audit, training and compliance services for data controllers and processors. It is encouraging to note that Nigeria’s model has become subject of intense studies for adoption within and outside Africa.

NITDA is pleased that due to its licensing of DPCOs, training and awareness on data privacy protection has been widely entrenched, jobs are being created, bureaucratic bottlenecks have been eliminated in the bid to comply and the country is fast-tracking its progress towards digital economy maturity.


ITPulse is a wholly information technology communication (ICT) news website, with a special focus on the African continent. The website provides up-to-date biz-tech news, analysis and comprehensive and thorough insight into the continent's ICT terrain

Leave A Reply